Back to Forum  View unanswered posts  View active topics

Page 1 of 1

[ 12 posts ] 

Author 
Message 
DZDjokovic

Post subject: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:02 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

Let P and Q be homogeneous polys of the same degree d in several variables. The bilinear dot product is defined by postulating that the momomials form an orthonormal basis. The degree d is large and P and Q have each a lot of terms. I would like to compute the dot product of P and Q efficiently trying to minimize the need for additional memory. Any suggestions how to do this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.


Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:11 am 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

Hi! Could you please give a small example? Besides, i would suggest using tensor product of your polynomial algebra with a noncommutative quotient algebra generated by your basis vectors (e.g. graded commutative http://www.singular.unikl.de/Manual/3 ... htm#SEC566 or similar) Cheers, Oleksandr


Top 


DZDjokovic

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:46 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

malex wrote: Hi! Could you please give a small example? Besides, i would suggest using tensor product of your polynomial algebra with a noncommutative quotient algebra generated by your basis vectors (e.g. graded commutative http://www.singular.unikl.de/Manual/3 ... htm#SEC566 or similar) Cheers, Oleksandr Hi, yes of course: Ring 32003, (x(1..6)), dp; poly P=(x(1)x(2))*(x(3)x(4))*(x(5)x(6)); poly Q=(x(1)+x(4)+x(6))*(x(1)+x(4)+x(5))*(x(2)+x(4)+x(5)); I think Singular expands the polynomials, so we get P=x(1)*x(3)*x(5)(x(1)*x(3)*x(6)x(1)*x(4)*x(5)... Q=x(1)^2*x(2)+x(1)^2*x(4)+x(1)^1*x(5)2*x(1)*x(2)*x(4)+2*x(1)*x(4)^2+3*x(1)*x(4)*x(5)... There are no squares of variables in P so all the termis in Q containing a square of a variable can be ignored (they are orthogonal to each term of P). The monomial x(1)*x(4)*x(5) occurs in both P and Q, with coefficients 1 and 3 respectively. Their contribution to the inner product (PQ) is (1)*3 = 3. The answer in this case is that (PQ)=2. I did not have time yet to follow your suggestion above (I shall try that later). However, if you can give me a short example of how to proceed, that would be the best. Thanks, Dragomir



Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:17 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

here you go: Code: > LIB "nctools.lib"; ring R = 32003, (x(1..6)), dp; def E = superCommutative(1,6); setring E; E; // characteristic : 32003 // number of vars : 6 // block 1 : ordering dp // : names x(1) x(2) x(3) x(4) x(5) x(6) // block 2 : ordering C // noncommutative relations: // x(2)x(1)=x(1)*x(2) // x(3)x(1)=x(1)*x(3) // x(4)x(1)=x(1)*x(4) // x(5)x(1)=x(1)*x(5) // x(6)x(1)=x(1)*x(6) // x(3)x(2)=x(2)*x(3) // x(4)x(2)=x(2)*x(4) // x(5)x(2)=x(2)*x(5) // x(6)x(2)=x(2)*x(6) // x(4)x(3)=x(3)*x(4) // x(5)x(3)=x(3)*x(5) // x(6)x(3)=x(3)*x(6) // x(5)x(4)=x(4)*x(5) // x(6)x(4)=x(4)*x(6) // x(6)x(5)=x(5)*x(6) // quotient ring from ideal _[1]=x(6)^2 _[2]=x(5)^2 _[3]=x(4)^2 _[4]=x(3)^2 _[5]=x(2)^2 _[6]=x(1)^2 > poly P=(x(1)x(2))*(x(3)x(4))*(x(5)x(6)); P; x(1)*x(3)*x(5)x(2)*x(3)*x(5)x(1)*x(4)*x(5)+x(2)*x(4)*x(5)x(1)*x(3)*x(6)+x(2)*x(3)*x(6)+x(1)*x(4)*x(6)x(2)*x(4)*x(6) > poly Q=(x(1)+x(4)+x(6))*(x(1)+x(4)+x(5))*(x(2)+x(4)+x(5)); Q; x(1)*x(2)*x(5)x(1)*x(4)*x(5)x(2)*x(4)*x(5)x(1)*x(2)*x(6)+x(1)*x(4)*x(6)+x(2)*x(4)*x(6)+x(1)*x(5)*x(6)+x(2)*x(5)*x(6) > P*Q; 0
note that x(i)*x(j) + x(j)*x(i) == 0



Top 


DZDjokovic

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:32 am 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

Dear Oleksandr, I really do not understand what this noncommutative ring has to do with my problem. May be I did not explain well what I mean by "inner product" (or "dot product"). Given a monomial M that occurs in P, say with coefficient "a", we have to test whether M also occurs in Q. If it does, and has coefficient "b", then I take the product "ab" of these coefficients. I run through all possible M's that occur in P and take the sum of all products "ab" that arise. This sum is my "inner product" which I want to compute. Dragomir


Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:17 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

I see. Sorry, i got confused by "The bilinear dot product is defined by postulating that the monomials form an orthonormal basis" since exterior algebra can be used for dealing with orthogonal monomial bases but probably will not do for your computation.
Please take a look at 'coeffs' and 'coeff' commands.
If those are too inefficient  one could consider writing a tiny dynamic module for that kind of kernel operation (list intersection with a twist).
Cheers, Oleksandr


Top 


DZDjokovic

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:47 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

Well, I am familiar with "coef" and "coeffs" commands. They have to be used several times to get down to the coefficients that I need and I could not make it efficient. I do not have any experience in writing the module that you mentioned. Where can I learn how to do that? Thanks, Dragomir


Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 7:18 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

Well, for writing a dynamic module you will need to learn Singular internals. I would suggest starting by looking at Singular/extra.cc for experimental routines (which can be run e.g. via system("foo", arglist) ) and writing your own by analogy. Besides, did you consider converting the shortest of your polynomials into a monomial ideal (like PP below) and using "coeffs ( ideal_expression, ideal_expression ) " for example as follows? Code: > ring R = 32003, (x(1..6)), dp; poly P=(x(1)x(2))*(x(3)x(4))*(x(5)x(6)); poly Q=(x(1)+x(4)+x(6))*(x(1)+x(4)+x(5))*(x(2)+x(4)+x(5)); > ideal PP = x(1)*x(3)*x(5),x(2)*x(3)*x(5),x(1)*x(4)*x(5),x(2)*x(4)*x(5),x(1)*x(3)*x(6),x(2)*x(3)*x(6),x(1)*x(4)*x(6),x(2)*x(4)*x(6); > coeffs(ideal(P,Q), PP); _[1,1]=1 _[1,2]=0 _[2,1]=1 _[2,2]=0 _[3,1]=1 _[3,2]=3 _[4,1]=1 _[4,2]=1 _[5,1]=1 _[5,2]=0 _[6,1]=1 _[6,2]=0 _[7,1]=1 _[7,2]=1 _[8,1]=1 _[8,2]=1 > print(_); 1, 0, 1,0, 1,3, 1, 1, 1,0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1,1


Top 


DZDjokovic

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:26 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

Hi Oleksandr, I better not try to learn the internals of Singular! I like your suggestion and wanted to try it. But I realized immediately that there is a problem of defining the ideal PP. You probably did it by hand, but this is impossible for me since P has may be milions of terms. I could not find any function to convert a poly to the sequence of the monomials that occur in it. I could convert poly to a string and then replace the signs '+' and '' with commas (although I do not know how to do that, just an idea) and at the same time eliminate the coefficients, to obtain this list as a string. But this seems rather complicated. There should be a better way. Can you help me with that problem? Thanks a lot, Dragomir


Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:48 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

Hi, what about using 'coef' as follows: Code: > ring R = 32003, (x(1..6)), dp; poly P=(x(1)x(2))*(x(3)x(4))*(x(5)x(6)); > matrix M=coef(P, x(1)*x(2)*x(3)*x(4)*x(5)*x(6)); M; // needs the product of all ring variables!!! M[1,1]=x(1)*x(3)*x(5) M[1,2]=x(2)*x(3)*x(5) M[1,3]=x(1)*x(4)*x(5) M[1,4]=x(2)*x(4)*x(5) M[1,5]=x(1)*x(3)*x(6) M[1,6]=x(2)*x(3)*x(6) M[1,7]=x(1)*x(4)*x(6) M[1,8]=x(2)*x(4)*x(6) M[2,1]=1 M[2,2]=1 M[2,3]=1 M[2,4]=1 M[2,5]=1 M[2,6]=1 M[2,7]=1 M[2,8]=1 > ideal PP = M[1,1..ncols(M)]; PP; PP[1]=x(1)*x(3)*x(5) PP[2]=x(2)*x(3)*x(5) PP[3]=x(1)*x(4)*x(5) PP[4]=x(2)*x(4)*x(5) PP[5]=x(1)*x(3)*x(6) PP[6]=x(2)*x(3)*x(6) PP[7]=x(1)*x(4)*x(6) PP[8]=x(2)*x(4)*x(6) > coeffs(ideal(Q), PP); _[1,1]=0 _[2,1]=0 _[3,1]=3 _[4,1]=1 _[5,1]=0 _[6,1]=0 _[7,1]=1 _[8,1]=1


Top 


DZDjokovic

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 1:07 am 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 10:17 pm Posts: 11

Hi Oleksandr, yes this works but I need to improve it further. Indeed P is much smaller (about 200 times) than Q. Moreover, in these particular computations, I may assume that P is the product of all differences x(i)x(j), 1<=i<j<=n (nvars=n). (In one computation, with n=9, I have size(P)=362 880 and size(Q)=75 510 055.) Thus each monomial in P has the exponents 0,1,2,...,n1 up to a permutation. I would like to throw away from Q all monomials which have two equal exponents or at least one exponent >n1 in order to make Q smaller. Is there a simple way to do at least one of these two things ? Thank you in advance for your answer, Dragomir


Top 


malex

Post subject: Re: Computing efficiently the dot product of homogeneous polys Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:10 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 10:33 pm Posts: 51 Location: Kaiserslautern

Hi, for removing multiples of squares you can use NF, for example as follows: Code: > ideal I = x(1)^2, x(2)^2, x(3)^2, x(4)^2, x(5)^2, x(6)^2; I = groebner(I); option(redTail); NF(Q, I); 2*x(1)*x(2)*x(4)x(1)*x(2)*x(5)+3*x(1)*x(4)*x(5)x(2)*x(4)*x(5)x(1)*x(2)*x(6)+x(1)*x(4)*x(6)x(2)*x(4)*x(6)+x(1)*x(5)*x(6)x(2)*x(5)*x(6)+2*x(4)*x(5)*x(6)
O.


Top 



Page 1 of 1

[ 12 posts ] 


You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum


It is currently Sat Feb 24, 2018 5:46 pm

