Opened 11 years ago
Last modified 11 years ago
#417 new bug
Sheaf cohomology commands based on local duality are not correct for 0th cohomology
Reported by: | decker | Owned by: | decker |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 3-1-5 and higher |
Component: | singular-libs | Version: | 3-1-4 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Here is an example:
LIB "sheafcoh.lib"; ring R = 0,(s,t,x(0..3)),Dp; ideal I = x(0)-s4,x(1)-s3t,x(2)-st3,x(3)-t4; ideal J = eliminate(I,s*t); ring S = 0,x(0..3),Dp; ideal I = imap(R,J); resolution Ir = mres(I,0); print(betti(Ir),"betti");
module M = Ir[1]; intvec DV = 0; attrib(M,"isHomog",DV);
dimH(0,M,1); sheafCoh(M,0,4);
sheafCohBGG(M,-3,3);
Change History (1)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
Summary: | Sheaf cohomology commands based on local cohomology are not correct for 0th cohomology → Sheaf cohomology commands based on local duality are not correct for 0th cohomology |
---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.